FRR-7.3-Snapcraft

Build: #2 failed

Job: LDP IPv4 Tests was successful

Build log

The build generated 7,287 lines of output.The output is too long and has been truncated to the last 1,000 lines. Download or view full build log.

17-Feb-2020 17:57:44 Upon receipt of an unknown [LDP] message, if Unknown Message bit (U)
17-Feb-2020 17:57:44 is clear (=0), a notification is returned to the message originator.
17-Feb-2020 17:57:44 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 17:57:44 RFC 3036, s3.5 p45 LDP Messages
17-Feb-2020 17:57:44 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 17:57:44 MUST
17-Feb-2020 17:59:09 Test ANVL-LDP-21.1: Passed
17-Feb-2020 17:59:09
17-Feb-2020 17:59:11 Test ANVL-LDP-21.2 executing
17-Feb-2020 17:59:11 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 17:59:11 Upon receipt of an unknown [LDP] message, if Unknown Message bit (U)
17-Feb-2020 17:59:11 ...is set (=1), the unknown message is silently ignored.
17-Feb-2020 17:59:11 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 17:59:11 RFC 3036, s3.5 p45 LDP Messages
17-Feb-2020 17:59:11 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 17:59:11 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:00:40 Test ANVL-LDP-21.2: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:00:40
17-Feb-2020 18:00:41 Test ANVL-LDP-21.5 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:00:41 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:00:41 Validate Notification Message TLV encoding from DUT
17-Feb-2020 18:00:41 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:00:41 RFC 3036, s3.5.1 p45 Notification Message
17-Feb-2020 18:00:41 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:00:41 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:02:09 Test ANVL-LDP-21.5: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:02:09
17-Feb-2020 18:02:11 Test ANVL-LDP-21.11 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:02:11 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:02:11 Validate KeepAlive Messages from DUT
17-Feb-2020 18:02:11 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:02:11 RFC 3036, s3.5.4 p63 KeepAlive Message
17-Feb-2020 18:02:11 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:02:11 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:03:29 Test ANVL-LDP-21.11: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:03:29
17-Feb-2020 18:03:30 Test ANVL-LDP-21.13 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:03:30 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:03:30 Validate Address Message format from DUT.
17-Feb-2020 18:03:30 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:03:30 RFC 3036, s3.5.5 p64 Address Message
17-Feb-2020 18:03:30 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:03:30 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:04:48 Test ANVL-LDP-21.13: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:04:48
17-Feb-2020 18:04:49 Test ANVL-LDP-21.14 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:04:49 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:04:49 When a new LDP session is initialized and before sending Label Mapping
17-Feb-2020 18:04:49 or Label Request messages an LSR should advertise its interface
17-Feb-2020 18:04:49 addresses with one or more Address messages.
17-Feb-2020 18:04:49 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:04:49 RFC 3036, s3.5.5.1 p65 Address Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 18:04:49 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:04:49 SHOULD
17-Feb-2020 18:06:07 Test ANVL-LDP-21.14: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:06:07
17-Feb-2020 18:06:09 Test ANVL-LDP-21.15 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:06:09 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:06:09 Whenever an LSR 'activates' a new interface address, it should
17-Feb-2020 18:06:09 advertise the new address with an Address message.
17-Feb-2020 18:06:09 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:06:09 RFC 3036, s3.5.5.1 p65 Address Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 18:06:09 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:06:09 SHOULD
17-Feb-2020 18:07:35 Test ANVL-LDP-21.15: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:07:35
17-Feb-2020 18:07:36 Test ANVL-LDP-21.16 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:07:36 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:07:36 Whenever an LSR 'de-activates' a previously advertised address, it
17-Feb-2020 18:07:36 should withdraw the address with an Address Withdraw message; see
17-Feb-2020 18:07:36 Section 'Address Withdraw Message'.
17-Feb-2020 18:07:36 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:07:36 RFC 3036, s3.5.5.1 p65 Address Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 18:07:36 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:07:36 SHOULD
17-Feb-2020 18:09:35 Test ANVL-LDP-21.16: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:09:35
17-Feb-2020 18:09:36 Test ANVL-LDP-21.17 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:09:36 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:09:36 If an LSR does not support the Address Family specified in the Address
17-Feb-2020 18:09:36 List TLV, it should send an 'Unsupported Address Family' Notification
17-Feb-2020 18:09:36 to its LDP signalling an error and abort processing the message.
17-Feb-2020 18:09:36 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:09:36 RFC 3036, s3.5.5.1 p65 Address Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 18:09:36 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:09:36 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:10:55 Test ANVL-LDP-21.17: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:10:55
17-Feb-2020 18:10:56 Test ANVL-LDP-21.18 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:10:56 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:10:56 Validate Address Withdraw Message format from DUT.
17-Feb-2020 18:10:56 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:10:56 RFC 3036, s3.5.6 p65 Address Withdraw Message
17-Feb-2020 18:10:56 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:10:56 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:12:45 Test ANVL-LDP-21.18: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:12:45
17-Feb-2020 18:12:46 Test ANVL-LDP-22.1 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:12:46 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:12:46 Malformed LDP PDUs or Messages that are part of the LDP Discovery
17-Feb-2020 18:12:46 mechanism are handled by silently discarding them.
17-Feb-2020 18:12:46 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:12:46 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:12:46 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:12:46 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:14:04 Test ANVL-LDP-22.1: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:14:04
17-Feb-2020 18:14:05 Test ANVL-LDP-22.2 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:14:05 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:14:05 Malformed LDP PDUs or Messages that are part of the LDP Discovery
17-Feb-2020 18:14:05 mechanism are handled by silently discarding them. (Targeted Hello)
17-Feb-2020 18:14:05 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:14:05 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:14:05 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:14:05 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:16:06 Test ANVL-LDP-22.2: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:16:06
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 Test ANVL-LDP-22.3 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 An LDP PDU received on a TCP connection for an LDP session is
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 malformed if (1) The LDP Identifier in the PDU header is unknown to
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 the receiver....This is a fatal error signaled by the Bad LDP
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 Identifier Status Code.
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:16:08 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:17:35 Test ANVL-LDP-22.3: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:17:35
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 Test ANVL-LDP-22.4 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 An LDP PDU received on a TCP connection for an LDP session is
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 malformed if (1) The LDP Identifier in the PDU header is...known but
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 is not the LDP Identifier associated by the receiver with the LDP
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 peer for this LDP session.  This is a fatal error signaled by the
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 Bad LDP Identifier Status Code.
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:17:36 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:19:05 Test ANVL-LDP-22.4: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:19:05
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 Test ANVL-LDP-22.5 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 An LDP PDU received on a TCP connection for an LDP session is
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 malformed if: (2) The LDP protocol version is not supported by the
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 receiver....This is a fatal error signaled by the Bad Protocol
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 Version Status Code. (DUT takes passive role)
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:19:07 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:20:34 Test ANVL-LDP-22.5: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:20:34
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 Test ANVL-LDP-22.6 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 An LDP PDU received on a TCP connection for an LDP session is
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 malformed if: (2) The LDP protocol version is not supported by the
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 receiver, or it is supported but is not the version negotiated for
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 the session during session establishment.  This is a fatal error
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 signaled by the Bad Protocol Version Status Code.
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:20:35 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:22:00 Test ANVL-LDP-22.6: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:22:00
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 Test ANVL-LDP-22.8 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 An LDP PDU received on a TCP connection for an LDP session is
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 malformed if: (2) The LDP protocol version is not supported by the
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 receiver....This is a fatal error signaled by the Bad Protocol
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 Version Status Code. (DUT takes active role)
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:22:02 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:23:30 Test ANVL-LDP-22.8: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:23:30
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 Test ANVL-LDP-22.9 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 An LDP PDU received on a TCP connection for an LDP session is
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 malformed if: (3) The PDU Length field is too small (< 14)....
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 This is a fatal error signaled by the Bad PDU Length Status Code.
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:23:32 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:25:00 Test ANVL-LDP-22.9: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:25:00
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 Test ANVL-LDP-22.10 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 An LDP PDU received on a TCP connection for an LDP session is
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 malformed if: (3) The PDU Length field is...too large (> maximum
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 PDU length).  This is a fatal error signaled by the Bad PDU Length
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 Status Code. (PDU contains random data)
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:25:02 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:26:30 Test ANVL-LDP-22.10: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:26:30
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 Test ANVL-LDP-22.11 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 An LDP PDU received on a TCP connection for an LDP session is
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 malformed if: (3) The PDU Length field is...too large (> maximum
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 PDU length).  This is a fatal error signaled by the Bad PDU Length
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 Status Code. (PDU contains Label Mapping messages)
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:26:32 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:28:00 Test ANVL-LDP-22.11: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:28:00
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 Test ANVL-LDP-22.12 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 An LDP PDU received on a TCP connection for an LDP session is
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 malformed if: (3) The PDU Length field is...too large (> maximum
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 PDU length).  This is a fatal error signaled by the Bad PDU Length
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 Status Code. (PDU contains Label Request messages)
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:28:02 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:29:30 Test ANVL-LDP-22.12: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:29:30
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 Test ANVL-LDP-22.13 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 An LDP Message is malformed if: (1) The Message Type is unknown. If
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 the Message Type is < 0x8000 (high order bit = 0) it is an error
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 signaled by the Unknown Message Type Status Code. If the Message Type
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 is >= 0x8000 (high order bit = 1) it is silently discarded.
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:29:32 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:33:40 Test ANVL-LDP-22.13: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:33:40
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 Test ANVL-LDP-22.15 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 An LDP Message is malformed if: (3) The message is missing one or more
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 Mandatory Parameters.  This is a non-fatal error signalled by the
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 Missing Message Parameters Status Code.
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.1 p49 Malformed PDU or Message
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:33:42 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:35:10 Test ANVL-LDP-22.15: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:35:10
17-Feb-2020 18:35:12 Test ANVL-LDP-22.16 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:35:12 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:35:12 Malformed TLVs contained in LDP messages that are part of the LDP
17-Feb-2020 18:35:12 Discovery mechanism are handled by silently discarding the containing
17-Feb-2020 18:35:12 message.
17-Feb-2020 18:35:12 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:35:12 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.2 p50 Unknown or Malformed TLV
17-Feb-2020 18:35:12 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:35:12 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:36:30 Test ANVL-LDP-22.16: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:36:30
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 Test ANVL-LDP-22.17 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 A TLV contained in an LDP message received on a TCP connection of an
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 LDP is malformed if: (1) The TLV Length is too large, that is,
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 indicates that the TLV extends beyond the end of the containing
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 message.  This is a fatal error signaled by the Bad TLV Length Status
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 Code.
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.2 p50 Unknown or Malformed TLV
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:36:31 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:37:42 Test ANVL-LDP-22.17: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:37:42
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 Test ANVL-LDP-22.18 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 A TLV contained in an LDP message received on a TCP connection of an
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 LDP is malformed if: (2) The TLV type is unknown.  If the TLV type is
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 < 0x8000 (high order bit 0) it is an error signaled by the Unknown TLV
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 Status Code.  If the TLV type is >= 0x8000 (high order bit 1) the TLV
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 is silently dropped.
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 RFC 3036, 3.5.1.2.2 p50 Unknown or Malformed TLV
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:37:44 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:41:51 Test ANVL-LDP-22.18: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:41:51
17-Feb-2020 18:41:52 Test ANVL-LDP-22.20 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:41:52 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:41:52 Timer expiration is a fatal error signaled by the KeepAlive Timer
17-Feb-2020 18:41:52 Expired Status Code.
17-Feb-2020 18:41:52 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:41:52 RFC 3036, s3.5.1.2.3 p48 Session KeepAlive Timer Expiration
17-Feb-2020 18:41:52 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:41:52 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:43:40 Test ANVL-LDP-22.20: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:43:40
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 Test ANVL-LDP-22.21 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 This is a fatal event signaled by the Shutdown Status Code.  The
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 Notification Message may optionally include an Extended Status TLV to
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 provide a reason for the Shutdown.  The sending LSR terminates the
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 session immediately after sending the Notification.
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 RFC 3036, s3.5.1.2.4 p51 Unilateral Session Shutdown
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:43:41 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:45:12 Test ANVL-LDP-22.21: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:45:12
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 Test ANVL-LDP-22.23 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 An LDP implementation may be capable of detecting problem conditions
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 specific to its implementation.  When such a condition prevents an
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 implementation from interacting correctly with a peer, the
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 implementation should, when capable of doing so, use the Internal
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 Error Status Code to signal the peer.  This is a fatal error.
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 RFC 3036, s3.5.1.2.7 p51 Internal Errors
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:45:13 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:46:48 Test ANVL-LDP-22.23: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:46:48
17-Feb-2020 18:46:50 Test ANVL-LDP-23.1 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:46:50 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:46:50 Validate Hello Messages encoding from DUT
17-Feb-2020 18:46:50 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:46:50 RFC 3036, s3.5.2 p52 Hello Messages
17-Feb-2020 18:46:50 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:46:50 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:47:42 Test ANVL-LDP-23.1: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:47:42
17-Feb-2020 18:47:43 Test ANVL-LDP-23.3 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:47:43 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:47:43 Hold Time: A value of 0 means use the default, which is 15 seconds for
17-Feb-2020 18:47:43 Link Hellos.  A value of 0xffff means infinite.
17-Feb-2020 18:47:43 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:47:43 RFC 3036, s3.5.2 p52 Hello Messages
17-Feb-2020 18:47:43 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:47:43 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:49:54 Test ANVL-LDP-23.3: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:49:54
17-Feb-2020 18:49:55 Test ANVL-LDP-23.4 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:49:55 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:49:55 Hold Time: A value of 0 means use the default, which is 45 seconds for
17-Feb-2020 18:49:55 Targeted Hellos.
17-Feb-2020 18:49:55 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:49:55 RFC 3036, s3.5.2 p52 Hello Messages
17-Feb-2020 18:49:55 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:49:55 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:52:19 Test ANVL-LDP-23.4: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:52:19
17-Feb-2020 18:52:21 Test ANVL-LDP-23.8 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:52:21 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:52:21 Reserved - This field is reserved.  It must be set to zero on
17-Feb-2020 18:52:21 transmission and ignored on receipt.
17-Feb-2020 18:52:21 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:52:21 RFC 3036, s3.5.2 p53 Hello Messages
17-Feb-2020 18:52:21 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:52:21 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:53:49 Test ANVL-LDP-23.8: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:53:49
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 Test ANVL-LDP-23.10 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 Optional TLV Configuration Sequence Number - Specifies a 4 octet
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 unsigned configuration sequence number that identifies the
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 configuration state of the sending LSR.  Used by the receiving LSR
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 to detect configuration changes on the sending LSR.
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 RFC 3036, s3.5.2 p52 Hello Messages
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:53:50 MAY
17-Feb-2020 18:54:42 Test ANVL-LDP-23.10: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:54:42
17-Feb-2020 18:54:44 Test ANVL-LDP-23.14 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:54:44 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:54:44 Received LDP Hello Message Step 2: If the Hello is not acceptable, the
17-Feb-2020 18:54:44 LSR ignores it.
17-Feb-2020 18:54:44 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:54:44 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 18:54:44 RFC 3036, s3.5.2.1 p54 Hello Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 18:54:44 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:54:44 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:57:32 Test ANVL-LDP-23.14: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:57:32
17-Feb-2020 18:57:34 Test ANVL-LDP-23.16 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:57:34 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:57:34 A Link Hello is acceptable if the interface on which it was received
17-Feb-2020 18:57:34 has been configured for label switching.
17-Feb-2020 18:57:34 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:57:34 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 18:57:34 RFC 3036, s3.5.2.1 p54 Hello Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 18:57:34 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:57:34 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:58:54 Test ANVL-LDP-23.16: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:58:54
17-Feb-2020 18:58:55 Test ANVL-LDP-24.1 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:58:55 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:58:55 Validate Initialization Messages encoding from DUT
17-Feb-2020 18:58:55 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:58:55 RFC 3036, s3.5.3 p55 Initialization Message
17-Feb-2020 18:58:55 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:58:55 MUST
17-Feb-2020 18:59:50 Test ANVL-LDP-24.1: Passed
17-Feb-2020 18:59:50
17-Feb-2020 18:59:52 Test ANVL-LDP-24.3 executing
17-Feb-2020 18:59:52 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 18:59:52 A, Label Advertisement Discipline - Indicates the type of Label
17-Feb-2020 18:59:52 advertisement.  A value of 0 means Downstream Unsolicited
17-Feb-2020 18:59:52 advertisement.
17-Feb-2020 18:59:52 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 18:59:52 RFC 3036, s3.5.3 p56 Initialization Messages
17-Feb-2020 18:59:52 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 18:59:52 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:00:50 Test ANVL-LDP-24.3: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:00:50
17-Feb-2020 19:00:52 Test ANVL-LDP-24.8 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:00:52 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:00:52 D, Loop Detection - Indicates whether loop detection based on path
17-Feb-2020 19:00:52 vectors is enabled.  A value of 0 means loop detection is disabled.
17-Feb-2020 19:00:52 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:00:52 RFC 3036, s3.5.3 p57 Initialization Messages
17-Feb-2020 19:00:52 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:00:52 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:01:50 Test ANVL-LDP-24.8: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:01:50
17-Feb-2020 19:01:52 Test ANVL-LDP-24.10 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:01:52 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:01:52 PVLim, Path Vector Limit - The configured maximum path vector length.
17-Feb-2020 19:01:52 Must be 0 if loop detection is disabled (D = 0).
17-Feb-2020 19:01:52 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:01:52 RFC 3036, s3.5.3 p57 Initialization Messages
17-Feb-2020 19:01:52 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:01:52 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:02:50 Test ANVL-LDP-24.10: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:02:50
17-Feb-2020 19:02:52 Test ANVL-LDP-24.14 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:02:52 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:02:52 Reserved - This field is reserved.  It must be set to zero on
17-Feb-2020 19:02:52 transmission and ignored on receipt.
17-Feb-2020 19:02:52 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:02:52 RFC 3036, s3.5.3 p57 Initialization Messages
17-Feb-2020 19:02:52 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:02:52 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:03:51 Test ANVL-LDP-24.14: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:03:51
17-Feb-2020 19:03:52 Test ANVL-LDP-24.15 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:03:52 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:03:52 Max PDU Length - Two octet unsigned integer that proposes the maximum
17-Feb-2020 19:03:52 allowable length for LDP PDUs for the session.  A value of 255 or less
17-Feb-2020 19:03:52 specifies the default maximum length of 4096 octets.
17-Feb-2020 19:03:52 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:03:52 RFC 3036, s3.5.3 p57 Initialization Messages
17-Feb-2020 19:03:52 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:03:52 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:06:40 Test ANVL-LDP-24.15: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:06:40
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 Test ANVL-LDP-24.19 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 Receiver LDP Identifier - If there is no matching Hello adjacency, the
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 LSR must send a Session Rejected/No Hello Notification message in
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 response to the Initialization message and not establish the session.
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 (Receiver LDP ID: incorrect LSR Id, correct label space)
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 RFC 3036, s3.5.3 p57 Initialization Messages
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:06:42 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:08:09 Test ANVL-LDP-24.19: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:08:09
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 Test ANVL-LDP-24.20 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 Receiver LDP Identifier - If there is no matching Hello adjacency, the
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 LSR must send a Session Rejected/No Hello Notification message in
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 response to the Initialization message and not establish the session.
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 (Receiver LDP ID: correct LSR Id, incorrect label space)
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 RFC 3036, s3.5.3 p57 Initialization Messages
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:08:11 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:09:34 Test ANVL-LDP-24.20: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:09:34
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 Test ANVL-LDP-26.7 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 An LSR receiving a Label Mapping message from a downstream LSR for a
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 Prefix or Host Address FEC Element should not use the label for
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 forwarding unless its routing table contains an entry that exactly
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 matches the FEC Element.
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 RFC 3036, s3.5.7.1 p67 Label Mapping Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:09:36 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:10:53 Test ANVL-LDP-26.7: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:10:53
17-Feb-2020 19:10:54 Test ANVL-LDP-26.8 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:10:54 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:10:54 An LSR configured for Independent Control and Downstream Unsolicited
17-Feb-2020 19:10:54 mode sends a mapping message when the LSR recognizes a new FEC via the
17-Feb-2020 19:10:54 forwarding table.
17-Feb-2020 19:10:54 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:10:54 RFC 3036, s3.5.7.1.1 p67 Independent Control Mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:10:54 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:10:54 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:11:52 Test ANVL-LDP-26.8: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:11:52
17-Feb-2020 19:11:54 Test ANVL-LDP-26.12 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:11:54 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:11:54 An LSR configured for Independent Control sends a mapping message when
17-Feb-2020 19:11:54 receiving a mapping from the downstream next hop and no upstream
17-Feb-2020 19:11:54 mapping has been created.
17-Feb-2020 19:11:54 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:11:54 RFC 3036, s3.5.7.1.1 p67 Independent Control Mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:11:54 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:11:54 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:13:01 Test ANVL-LDP-26.12: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:13:01
17-Feb-2020 19:13:03 Test ANVL-LDP-27.7 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:13:03 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:13:03 The receiving LSR should respond to a Label Request message with a
17-Feb-2020 19:13:03 Label Mapping for the requested label or with a Notification message
17-Feb-2020 19:13:03 indicating why it cannot satisfy the request.
17-Feb-2020 19:13:03 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:13:03 RFC 3036, s3.5.8.1 p71 Label Request Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 19:13:03 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:13:03 SHOULD
17-Feb-2020 19:14:36 Test ANVL-LDP-27.7: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:14:36
17-Feb-2020 19:14:37 Test ANVL-LDP-28.12 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:14:37 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:14:37 Validate the Label Withdraw Message encoding from DUT
17-Feb-2020 19:14:37 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:14:37 RFC 3036, s3.5.10 p74 Label Withdraw Message
17-Feb-2020 19:14:37 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:14:37 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:15:47 Test ANVL-LDP-28.12: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:15:47
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 Test ANVL-LDP-28.15 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 An LSR transmits a Label Withdraw message under the following
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 conditions: (1) The LSR no longer recognizes a previously known FEC
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 for which it has advertised a label; (2) The LSR has decided
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 unilaterally (e.g., via configuration) to no longer label switch a FEC
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 (or FECs) with the label mapping being withdrawn.
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 When LSR unilaterally decides (or is re-configured) to no longer label
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 switch a particular FEC, Execute procedure Send_Label_Withdraw (Peer,
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 FEC, PrevAdvLabel)
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 RFC 3036, s3.5.10.1 p75 Label Withdraw Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.14 p120 LSR decides to no longer label switch
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 a FEC
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:15:49 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:16:52 Test ANVL-LDP-28.15: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:16:52
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 Test ANVL-LDP-28.19 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 The FEC TLV may contain the Wildcard FEC Element; if so, it may
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 contain no other FEC Elements.  In this case, if...there is not an
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 optional Label TLV in the Label Withdraw message, then the sending
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 LSR is withdrawing all label mappings previously advertised to the
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 receiving LSR.
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 RFC 3036, s3.5.10.1 p76 Label Withdraw Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:16:53 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:18:42 Test ANVL-LDP-28.19: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:18:42
17-Feb-2020 19:18:43 Test ANVL-LDP-28.21 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:18:43 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:18:43 Validate Label Release Message encoding from DUT
17-Feb-2020 19:18:43 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:18:43 RFC 3036, s3.5.11 p76 Label Release Message
17-Feb-2020 19:18:43 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:18:43 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:19:52 Test ANVL-LDP-28.21: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:19:52
17-Feb-2020 19:19:53 Test ANVL-LDP-28.22 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:19:53 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:19:53 Validate optional Label TLV encoding from DUT in Label Release
17-Feb-2020 19:19:53 Message
17-Feb-2020 19:19:53 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:19:53 RFC 3036, s3.5.11 p77 Label Release Message
17-Feb-2020 19:19:53 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:19:53 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:21:02 Test ANVL-LDP-28.22: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:21:02
17-Feb-2020 19:21:04 Test ANVL-LDP-28.23 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:21:04 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:21:04 An LSR must transmit a Label Release message under any of the
17-Feb-2020 19:21:04 following conditions: (3) The LSR receives a Label Withdraw
17-Feb-2020 19:21:04 message.
17-Feb-2020 19:21:04 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:21:04 RFC 3036, s3.5.11.1 p77 Label Release Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 19:21:04 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:21:04 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:22:12 Test ANVL-LDP-28.23: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:22:12
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 Test ANVL-LDP-28.26 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 Note that if an LSR is configured for 'liberal mode', a Release
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 message will never be transmitted in the case of condition (1)
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 as specified above.  In this case [LSR which sent the label
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 mapping is no longer the next hop for the mapped FEC], the upstream
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 LSR keeps each unused label, so that it can immediately be used later
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 if the downstream peer becomes the next hop for the FEC.
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 RFC 3036, s3.5.11.1 p77 Label Release Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:22:14 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:23:51 Test ANVL-LDP-28.26: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:23:51
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 Test ANVL-LDP-28.27 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 Note that if an LSR is configured for 'liberal mode', a Release
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 message will never be transmitted in the case of condition (2)
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 as specified above.  In this case [LSR receives a label mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 from an LSR which is not the next hop for the FEC], the upstream LSR
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 keeps each unused label, so that it can immediately be used later if
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 the downstream peer becomes the next hop for the FEC.
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 RFC 3036, s3.5.11.1 p77 Label Release Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:23:52 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:25:29 Test ANVL-LDP-28.27: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:25:29
17-Feb-2020 19:25:30 Test ANVL-LDP-31.1 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:25:30 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:25:30 The UDP port for LDP Hello messages is 646
17-Feb-2020 19:25:30 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:25:30 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 19:25:30 RFC 3036, s3.10.1 p83 Well-known Numbers/UDP and TCP Ports
17-Feb-2020 19:25:30 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:25:30 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:28:19 Test ANVL-LDP-31.1: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:28:19
17-Feb-2020 19:28:21 Test ANVL-LDP-31.2 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:28:21 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:28:21 The TCP port for establishing LDP session connections is 646
17-Feb-2020 19:28:21 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:28:21 RFC 3036, s3.10.1 p83 Well-known Numbers/UDP and TCP Ports
17-Feb-2020 19:28:21 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:28:21 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:29:10 Test ANVL-LDP-31.2: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:29:10
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 Test ANVL-LDP-32.1 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 An LSR can reduce the threat of spoofed Basic Hellos by accepting
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 Basic Hellos only on interfaces to which LSRs that can be trusted are
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 directly connected.
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 LDP provides two potential targets for denial of service (DoS)
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 attacks:
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 (1) Well known UDP Port for LDP Discovery.  An LSR administrator can
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 address the threat of DoS attacks via Basic Hellos by ensuring that
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 the LSR is directly connected only to peers which can be trusted to
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 not initiate such an attack.
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 RFC 3036, s5.1 p86 Spoofing
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 RFC 3036, s5.3 p87 Denial of Service
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:29:12 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:30:34 Test ANVL-LDP-32.1: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:30:34
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 Test ANVL-LDP-32.4 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 An LSR can reduce the threat of spoofed Extended Hellos by filtering
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 them and accepting only those originating at sources permitted by an
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 access list. (DUT is passive for session establishment)
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 RFC 3036, s5.1 p86 Spoofing
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:30:35 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:32:34 Test ANVL-LDP-32.4: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:32:34
17-Feb-2020 19:32:35 Test ANVL-LDP-32.5 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:32:35 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:32:35 An LSR can reduce the threat of spoofed Extended Hellos by filtering
17-Feb-2020 19:32:35 them and accepting only those originating at sources permitted by an
17-Feb-2020 19:32:35 access list. (DUT is active for session establishment)
17-Feb-2020 19:32:35 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:32:35 RFC 3036, s5.1 p86 Spoofing
17-Feb-2020 19:32:35 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:32:35 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:34:34 Test ANVL-LDP-32.5: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:34:34
17-Feb-2020 19:34:36 Test ANVL-LDP-32.6 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:34:36 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:34:36 An LSR can reduce the threat of spoofed Extended Hellos by filtering
17-Feb-2020 19:34:36 them and accepting only those originating at sources permitted by an
17-Feb-2020 19:34:36 access list.
17-Feb-2020 19:34:36 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:34:36 RFC 3036, s5.1 p86 Spoofing
17-Feb-2020 19:34:36 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:34:36 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:36:01 Test ANVL-LDP-32.6: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:36:01
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 Test ANVL-LDP-32.7 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 An LSR can reduce the threat of spoofed Extended Hellos by filtering
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 them and accepting only those originating at sources permitted by an
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 access list.
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 RFC 3036, s5.1 p86 Spoofing
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:36:02 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:38:05 Test ANVL-LDP-32.7: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:38:05
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 Test ANVL-LDP-32.10 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 An LSR can reduce the threat of spoofed Basic Hellos by ignoring Basic
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 Hellos not addressed to the All Routers on this Subnet multicast
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 group.
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 RFC 3036, s5.1 p86 Spoofing
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:38:07 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:40:07 Test ANVL-LDP-32.10: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:40:07
17-Feb-2020 19:40:08 Test ANVL-LDP-33.4 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:40:08 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:40:08 If there is no Next Hop, Execute procedure Send_Notification
17-Feb-2020 19:40:08 (MsgSource, No Route)
17-Feb-2020 19:40:08 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:40:08 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.1 p97 Receive Label Request
17-Feb-2020 19:40:08 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:40:08 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:41:36 Test ANVL-LDP-33.4: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:41:36
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 Test ANVL-LDP-34.2 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 If the received label mapping does not match an outstanding label
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 request for FEC previously sent to MsgSource, and no loop detected,
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 and LSR does not have a previously received label mapping for FEC from
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 MsgSource for the LSP in question, and the MsgSource is not the Next
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 Hop for the FEC, and LSR is using liberal label retention, record
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 label mapping for FEC with label and received attributes from
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 MsgSource.
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 (LMp.1->3->9->11->12->13->33)
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.2 p99 Receive Label Mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:41:37 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:42:46 Test ANVL-LDP-34.2: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:42:46
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 Test ANVL-LDP-34.3 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 If the received label mapping does not match an outstanding label
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 request for FEC previously sent to MsgSource, and no loop detected,
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 and LSR does not have a previously received label mapping for FEC from
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 MsgSource for the LSP in question, and the MsgSource is the Next Hop
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 for the FEC, and LSR is not ingress for FEC, and for each peer that
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 LSR has previously sent a label mapping for FEC for the LSP in
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 question, and for each peer that received attributes in the received
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 label mapping are not consistent with those previously sent, and for
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 each peer that LSR does not have any pending label requests for FEC,
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 record label mapping for FEC with label and received attributes from
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 MsgSource, and send a label mapping to peer and update record of label
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 mapping for FEC previously sent to peer to include the new attributes
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 sent, and perform LSR Label Use procedure.
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 (LMp.1->3->9->11->12->14->16->17->18->22->23->24->25->26->27->28->
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48      30->31->33)
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.2 p99 Receive Label Mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:42:48 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:43:57 Test ANVL-LDP-34.3: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:43:57
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 Test ANVL-LDP-34.5 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 If the received label mapping does not match an outstanding label
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 request for FEC previously sent to MsgSource, and no loop detected,
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 and LSR does not have a previously received label mapping for FEC from
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 MsgSource for the LSP in question, and the MsgSource is the Next Hop
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 for the FEC, and LSR is not ingress for FEC, and for each peer that
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 LSR has not previously sent a label mapping for FEC for the LSP in
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 question, and if DU ordered control is not in use by LSR, and LSR has
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 no label requests for FEC from peer marked as pending, record label
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 mapping for FEC with label and received attributes from MsgSource,
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 and perform LSR Label Use procedure.
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 (LMp.1->3->9->11->12->14->16->17->18->19->28->30->31->33)
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.2 p99 Receive Label Mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:43:58 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:45:26 Test ANVL-LDP-34.5: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:45:26
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 Test ANVL-LDP-34.11 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 If the received label mapping does not match an outstanding label
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 request for FEC previously sent to MsgSource, and no loop detected,
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 and LSR has a previously received label mapping for FEC from MsgSource
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 for the LSP in question, and the label previously received from
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 MsgSource does not match label received in message, execute procedure
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 Send_Message(MsgSource, Label Release, FEC, Label).
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 (LMp.1->3->9->10->32->33)
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.2 p99 Receive Label Mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:45:28 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:46:40 Test ANVL-LDP-34.11: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:46:40
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 Test ANVL-LDP-34.13 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 If the received label mapping does not match an outstanding label
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 request for FEC previously sent to MsgSource, and no loop detected,
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 and LSR does have a previously received label mapping for FEC from
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 MsgSource for the LSP in question, and the label previously received
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 from MsgSource matches label received in the message, and the
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 MsgSource is not the Next Hop for the FEC, and LSR is using liberal
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 label retention, record label mapping for FEC with label and received
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 attributes from MsgSource.
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 (LMp.1->3->9->10->11->12->13->33)
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.2 p99 Receive Label Mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:46:41 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:48:27 Test ANVL-LDP-34.13: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:48:27
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 Test ANVL-LDP-34.16 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 If the received label mapping does not match an outstanding label
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 request for FEC previously sent to MsgSource, and no loop detected,
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 and LSR has a previously received label mapping for FEC from MsgSource
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 for the LSP in question, and the label previously received from
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 MsgSource matches label received in the message, and the MsgSource is
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 the Next Hop for the FEC, and LSR is not ingress for FEC, and for each
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 peer that LSR has not previously sent a label mapping for FEC for the
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 LSP in question, and if DU ordered control is not in use by LSR, and
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 LSR has no label requests for FEC from peer marked as pending, record
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 label mapping for FEC with label and received attributes from
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 MsgSource, and perform LSR Label Use procedure.
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 (LMp.1->3->9->10->11->12->14->16->17->18->19->28->30->31->33)
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.2 p99 Receive Label Mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:48:28 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:50:04 Test ANVL-LDP-34.16: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:50:04
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 Test ANVL-LDP-35.18 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 Note 4: An unsolicited mapping with a different label from the same
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 peer would be an attempt to establish multipath label switching, which
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 is not supported in this version of LDP.
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 NEGATIVE
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 RFC 3036 Appendix A - A.1.2 p104 Receive Label Mapping
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:50:06 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:51:15 Test ANVL-LDP-35.18: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:51:15
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 Test ANVL-LDP-37.4 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 If LSR receives a Label Release (that does not match any outstanding
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 Label Withdraws) and LSR is the egress and is not merging, then
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 Remove Label from forwarding/switching use for traffic from MsgSource
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 and if any peers do not still hold the label, free the label.
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 LRl.1->2->4->6->10->11->12->13
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.4 p107 Receive Label Release
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:51:16 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:52:47 Test ANVL-LDP-37.4: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:52:47
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 Test ANVL-LDP-37.6 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 If LSR receives a Label Release (that does not match any outstanding
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 Label Withdraws) and LSR is not the egress and is not merging, and
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 the LSR is not configured to propagate releases, then Remove Label
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 from forwarding/switching use for traffic from MsgSource and if any
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 peers do not still hold the label, free the label.
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 LRl.1->2->4->6->7->8->10->11->12->13
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.4 p107 Receive Label Release
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:52:48 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:54:37 Test ANVL-LDP-37.6: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:54:37
17-Feb-2020 19:54:38 Test ANVL-LDP-37.10 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:54:38 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:54:38 Note 1: If LSR is using Downstream Unsolicited label distribution, it
17-Feb-2020 19:54:38 should not re-advertise a label mapping for FEC to MsgSource until
17-Feb-2020 19:54:38 MsgSource requests it.
17-Feb-2020 19:54:38 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:54:38 RFC 3036 Appendix A - A.1.4 p108 Receive Label Release
17-Feb-2020 19:54:38 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:54:38 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:56:34 Test ANVL-LDP-37.10: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:56:34
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 Test ANVL-LDP-37.13 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 An LSR that receives a Label Withdraw message must respond with a
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 Label Release message.
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 When receiving a Label Withdraw, remove Label from forwarding/
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 switching use and Execute procedure Send_Message (MsgSource, Label
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 Release, FEC, Label)
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 RFC 3036, s3.5.10.1 p76 Label Withdraw Message Procedures
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.5 p110 Receive Label Withdraw
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:56:35 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:57:45 Test ANVL-LDP-37.13: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:57:45
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 Test ANVL-LDP-38.2 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 When learning a new FEC while configured for Downstream Unsolicited
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 Independent Control, if LSR does not have previously retained label
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 mapping from the Next Hop for FEC, and Next Hop is not a peer, repeat
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 LSR Label Distribution procedure (FEC.1) for each Peer.
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 (FEC.1->2->3->6)
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 RFC 3036, Appendix A.1.6 p111 Recognize New FEC
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:57:46 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:58:46 Test ANVL-LDP-38.2: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:58:46
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 Test ANVL-LDP-42.3 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 If the LSR has a label to allocate, allocate label and bind it to the
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 FEC, install label for forwarding/switching use, execute procedure
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 Send_Message(Peer, Label Mapping, FEC, Label, Attributes), record
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 label mapping for FEC with label and attributes has been sent to peer,
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 and if LSR does not have a record of a FEC label request from peer
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 marked as pending, return success.
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 (SL.1->2->3->4->5->6->8)
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 RFC 3036, Appendix A.2.1 p121 Send_Label
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:58:47 MUST
17-Feb-2020 19:59:44 Test ANVL-LDP-42.3: Passed
17-Feb-2020 19:59:44
17-Feb-2020 19:59:45 Test ANVL-LDP-42.11 executing
17-Feb-2020 19:59:45 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 19:59:45 If received attributes do not include Hop Count, return No Loop
17-Feb-2020 19:59:45 Detected.
17-Feb-2020 19:59:45 (CRa.1->5)
17-Feb-2020 19:59:45 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 19:59:45 RFC 3036, Appendix A.2.6 p126 Check_Received_Attributes
17-Feb-2020 19:59:45 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 19:59:45 MUST
17-Feb-2020 20:00:47 Test ANVL-LDP-42.11: Passed
17-Feb-2020 20:00:47
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 Test ANVL-LDP-42.13 executing
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 If received attributes include Hop Count and Hop Count does not exceed
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 Max allowable hop count, and received attributes do not include Path
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 Vector, return No Loop Detected.
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 (CRa.1->2->3->5)
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 RFC 3036, Appendix A.2.6 p126 Check_Received_Attributes
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 20:00:49 MUST
17-Feb-2020 20:01:47 Test ANVL-LDP-42.13: Passed
17-Feb-2020 20:01:47
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 Test ANVL-LDP-42.15 executing
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 Test Summary
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 If received attributes include Hop Count and Hop Count does not exceed
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 Max allowable hop count, and received attributes include Path Vector,
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 and the Path Vector does not include LSR Id, and length of Path Vector
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 does not exceed Max allowable length, return No Loop Detected.
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 (CRa.1->2->3->4->5)
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 Test Reference
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 RFC 3036, Appendix A.2.6 p126 Check_Received_Attributes
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 Test Classification
17-Feb-2020 20:01:49 MUST
17-Feb-2020 20:02:47 Test ANVL-LDP-42.15: Passed
17-Feb-2020 20:02:47
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Writing DejaGNU Result file to ./ldp-result.xml
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Finished task 'Run LDP IPv4 4-Byte AS Tests' with result: Success
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Starting task 'Collect ANVL Results' of type 'com.atlassian.bamboo.plugins.testresultparser:task.testresultparser.junit'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Parsing test results under /root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRR73SNAP-IPV4LDP...
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Finished task 'Collect ANVL Results' with result: Success
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Running post build plugin 'Docker Container Cleanup'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Running post build plugin 'NCover Results Collector'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Running post build plugin 'Clover Results Collector'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Running post build plugin 'npm Cache Cleanup'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Running post build plugin 'Artifact Copier'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Successfully removed working directory at '/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRR73SNAP-IPV4LDP'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Finalising the build...
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Stopping timer.
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Build FRR-FRR73SNAP-IPV4LDP-2 completed.
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Running on server: post build plugin 'NCover Results Collector'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Running on server: post build plugin 'Build Hanging Detection Configuration'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Running on server: post build plugin 'Clover Delta Calculator'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Running on server: post build plugin 'Maven Dependencies Postprocessor'
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 All post build plugins have finished
17-Feb-2020 20:02:52 Generating build results summary...
17-Feb-2020 20:02:53 Saving build results to disk...
17-Feb-2020 20:02:53 Logging substituted variables...
17-Feb-2020 20:02:53 Indexing build results...
17-Feb-2020 20:02:53 Finished building FRR-FRR73SNAP-IPV4LDP-2.